Contact Us

Vivid Seats

Google Search Steroid Nation

Google List

  • Count

EMail Tips


  • eXTReMe Tracker
  • -- The People's Sports Network
  • Blogarama - The Blog Directory
  • Top Sports Blogs

Tip Jar

Change is good

Tip Jar

February 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28    
Blog powered by Typepad

« IOC expects 7 more doping cases from 2008 Beijing Olympics, Jacques Rogge says | Main | Breeders Cup Report: No horsing around with steroids, EPO, or bicarb »



Jean Poole

What are they going to do? Ship all doping suspects off to Strasburg? Politically ill advised. It reeks of the one-world-government self-righteous socialist internationalists. I don't think "sport" needs it. I don't think any of us need more wessonality on the playground slide.

Millard Baker

The U.S. already has laws that criminalize the non-medical use and possession of anabolic steroids. These laws were created specifically to target PED use in elite sports.

But as you note, they have been terribly ineffective and I would add, misguided. The laws ended up being used against non-athletes. Federal prosecutors have had to use "perjury laws" of all things to prosecute athletes for doping.

Also as noted, there are no anti-doping laws in the U.S. (i.e. laws against steroid use specifically in a sporting context) only steroid laws (broader laws that cover steroid use in all contexts).

This differs from the U.K. where athletes (and non-athletes) can legally possess and import personal supply of AAS (for personal use only). But steroid distribution is still criminalized.

I think the IOC has a problem with the fact that athletes in the UK can technically use AAS and PEDs without violating the law. This is not possible in the U.S. So I don't see the IOC having a problem with the existing U.S. laws.

ralph lauren racing

good boy and girls
come on, models

The comments to this entry are closed.