Prof Lee Sweeney of the University of Pennsylvania will be behind the introduction of a gene therapy approach to treat aged dogs who suffer muscular weakness. Apparently elderly dogs who become progressively weaker (this is generally called old age) need treatments so their owners can take the canines on walks. The therapy involves the injection of a genetically modified myostatin inhibitor that produces incredible muscular hypertrophy; the injection goes into the animal's liver.
Once this gene therapy reaches the public, h ow long will it be before an existing sports record becomes totally obliterated by newly enhanced and genetically modified athletes?
This raises several issues just in the vet use of the technique:
- Isn't aging natural? Do elderly dogs -- as lovable as they are -- really need to be revitalized so the owners can walk them? At what cost?
- Might counseling on the normal aging in biology be more effective? Aging is part of every organism. Why fight the changes that are inherent in the DNA of the animal, to protect the fragile emotional status of the owner?
An American professor is preparing to market a form of canine gene therapy, which would see dogs injected with substances which switch off the genes that regulate their muscle growth.
Prof Lee Sweeney, from the University of Pennsylvania, has pioneered research into gene transfer technology, a field in which poorly functioning and abnormal genes are manipulated, switched off or replaced.
Ten years ago he created "mighty mice" in the lab with enormous muscles and strength in old age. Now he says experiments on dogs have been so successful that he is preparing to market the treatments to owners of ageing pets across the United States.
He said: "We are now in the final stages of getting all the approvals to offer this through the veterinary hospital as a treatment to try to improve strength in pet dogs.
"As the dogs get weak their owners get upset that they can't walk around any more. So we're hoping that within the next year we will begin the era of genetic enhancement in dogs."
Under the therapy, dogs would be given an injection into the liver of an inhibitor which switches off the gene which produces myostatin, a protein which inhibits muscle growth in animals and humans.
One would hope Sweeney has considered the implications of his genetic enhancement. The first issue is the economic issue of enhancing an aging dog to mollify the owner. Obviously an aging animal in the wild gets eaten, which is not a good outcome for a domestic pet. Domestic pets decline gradually, with the resultant dysfunction experienced by all aging organisms; pet owners keep the animals comfortable until the inevitable sad day when the pet can longer function well. But does this justify an attempt to allay the aging process in a canine? At what price?
Sweeney must consider that if the gene therapy is marketed to vets, that soon, genetically enhanced greyhounds will be winning the dog races. Once the Schwarzenegger greyhounds win races, human athletes will take notice; actually they already have. To the Telegraph again:
He (Dr. Sweeney) gets between five and 10 emails a week from athletes, some from Britain, and so many phone calls that his secretary has stopped putting them through. And that is in a quiet week.
If he publishes an academic paper or does a media interview, a flurry of 50 or more calls and emails usually follows, as it did 10 years ago when he first revealed his 'mighty mice' to the world at a meeting of the American Society for Cell Biology – laboratory mice with enormous muscles that retained their strength and regenerative ability even when the animals reached old age.
Sweeney's super-strong rodents were the product of his pioneering research into gene transfer technology and the implications were clearly not lost on the athletes and coaches who got in touch, one of whom offered $100,000 for what the mice were getting.
Shockingly, Sweeney also received a request from a high school American football coach for his entire team to be genetically modified.
Sweeney told him what he is still telling everyone a decade later, that bulking up on gene therapy is not yet safe enough for humans and would require heavy-duty immune suppression. He always gets the same response.
"Even if I explain to them that to make it work might require all sorts of heroic measures, they basically say, 'Fine. I'll do it'. And if it's a matter of money, they'll get the money."
Sweeney has never been contacted by a name he recognises – "I don't get Barry Bonds calling me up" – and says most of the would-be guinea pigs appear to be young athletes trying to make the big time.
"Some of them are from Europe," he says. "I get quite a few from the UK and Germany."
He says he would feel uneasy about passing on their names to the anti-doping authorities but is sufficiently concerned to have accepted a seat on the gene-doping panel of the World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada), who are funding eight research projects on gene-doping detection in a desperate attempt to stay ahead of the cheats.
Sweeney is bracing himself for another surge of calls and emails next year when his work moves from the laboratory to the commercial world with a muscle-building gene therapy for dogs.
Even though Sweeney knows the illicit demand for the mystatin inhibitor, he will market the drug anyway...ah the power of economic windfalls can outstrip the ethical considerations of the enhancements.
We have a chapter on genetic enhanced performance (GEP) or Performance Enhancing Genetics (PEGs) that looks at the issues. Sweeney has considered the issues too as summed up by the Telegraph:
Sweeney hopes his new canine anti-aging treatment will be just the start. Humans have the same gene that Sweeney is manipulating in dogs and the nex step will be to treat people with serious genetic diseases such as muscular dystrophy. Ultimately, he hopes to give the elderly, like the pampered pooches of Pennsylvania, greater muscle strength and mobility in their final years.
But any breakthrough will inevitably be seized upon by dope cheats in the same way that clinical drugs such as steroids, human growth hormone and the red blood cell-boosting EPO soon found their way into kit bags. With the prospect of as yet undetectable, lifelong enhancement, how could any drug cheat resist?
As gene transfer technology enters the medical mainstream as a treatment for numerous diseases from blindness to cancer, scientists are agreed it is only a matter of time before it crosses over into sport.
Some predict that London 2012 could be the first genetically modified Olympic Games. Others say the Beijing Games may already have that dubious honour.
Here is a therapeutic enhancement that may render all PEDs obsolete. The results are shockingly dramatically impressive; the technology undetectable at present; and the technique will soon be available.
Performance Enhancing Drugs are simply amateurs when compared to the potential power of Performance Enhancing Genetics. Looks like that brave new world of astonishing sports feats will be ushered in very very soon.
Two comments:
1) On extending the lives of dogs. Dogs are an interesting case, especially larger dogs - they really do just "lose all the muscle" at a certain point, and while they may otherwise be completely healthy, can't get up to go to the bathroom. For me, I have no problems with trying to resolve that issue (old dogs will still die - but it'll be organ failure, or disease, not just muscle/bone loss), anymore than I would have a problem with humans shooting for the same thing (for health/medical reasons).
2) The main problem with sports doping is the specialized (and individual) nature of the sports. There will be NO END to enhancement and modification. It's unstoppable. But, what can be done, is to modify the sports to take this into account. Why not just make olympic teams much smaller, and force the athletes to participate in a range of individual/team events (perhaps not revealing the events until they begin). For individual events, no amount of doping is going to make up for not being fully proficient in the event, and no pure-physical edge will win out against a well-built team of athletes who work well together. Never mind the benefits to the athletes - rather than being locked away in a gymnastics dungeon in the Himalayas from the age of 6, they'd actually have to work on people skills, collaboration, and breadth of experience.
I actually see interesting aspects of this in reality TV - the superlatives that always seem like the favorites at the outset inevitably get tripped up when they step out of their comfort zone... OR, eventually standing out is less safe than blending in. The same idea could "save" natural-performance sporting, and really any other serious but over-specialized endeavor (Survivor Politics, anyone?).
-deano
Posted by: deano | 11/16/2008 at 13:12
This man has worked for decades to achieve this and you call that an economic windfall. This man may be able to increase the quality of life for all of mankind and you think that a few athletes risking their own health is more of a concern. WTF.
Posted by: Jeff | 05/27/2009 at 05:32
Here's another kid born with the genetic defect. He doesn't need gene therapy.
http://cbs5.com/health/superkid.myostatin.related.2.974068.html
"Liam Hoekstra likely has a condition called myostatin-related muscle hypertrophy, which means his body has very little fat and enlarged muscle fibers that make him exceptionally strong
"Less than 100 cases discovered."
Interesting case report in NEJM
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/350/26/2682
Posted by: Busted Supplements | 05/27/2009 at 18:03
http://grg51.typepad.com/steroid_nation/2007/02/breaking_news_h.html
Posted by: ugg boots | 10/28/2010 at 03:37
Take everything in and try to memorize everything that's around you.
Posted by: sedona tours | 04/07/2011 at 09:31
Appreciate so much for exerting your effort to write this up and share with us. Every second of my time reading is worth it.
Posted by: pet health | 04/13/2011 at 01:51
Very, very nicely done!
Posted by: supra youth | 10/13/2011 at 21:26
Serious work! Deserves respect!
Posted by: Anton | 11/16/2011 at 08:59