The Wall Street Journal dug up an interesting study from Umea University. The study from the Department of Integrative Medical Biology at Umea (Sweden) demonstrated long term muscle changes in anabolic steroids users -- despite current abstinence. The WSJ related these changes to MLB stats. (here)
In the study, which was completed in October 2006 by the Department of Integrative Medical Biology at Sweden's Umea University, researchers took muscle biopsies from 26 elite powerlifters who have competed at the sport's highest levels. Ten of the volunteers said they were not steroid users, but the other 16 had either admitted using these drugs in the past or said they were currently using them. Not only is it unusual for scientists to study elite athletes of any kind, it's almost impossible to study top athletes who are using steroids in competition.
When the researchers looked at the subjects' muscles through a microscope, they made a surprising discovery: Rather than returning to their original proportions, the muscles of the steroid users who'd stopped taking the drug looked remarkably similar to those of the subjects who were still using. They also had larger muscle fibers and more growth-inducing "myonuclei" in their muscle cells than the nonsteroid users.
The Journal says the study was published at the U of Umea's website, however this may be the journal abstract.
Interesting that anabolic steroid use increases muscle fiber size, and increases myonuclei number. Perhaps this priming effects on muscle cells produces not only acute effects to enhance strength, but also enhances the use of HGH later in 'abstinent steroid users' (or concurrent users) as noted in this study.
Strength, peak power output and IGF-I significantly increased and total protein, albumin and free tetra-iodothyronine significantly decreased compared to controls (p < 0.05) and within the GH group (p < 0.017). Fat-free mass index and VO2 peak significantly increased, while body fat and thyroid-stimulating hormone significantly decreased within the GH group (p < 0.017). Conclusions: Short-term rhGH increased strength and power. Of therapeutic value is the possibility that muscle bulk and strength could be increased in patients with muscle-wasting conditions.
Thus, one of the reasons administering HGH to college students does not enhance strength -- their muscle cells are not previously primed with AASs. Charles Yesalis understands this:
Charles Yesalis, a former strength coach and professor emeritus of health policy and administration at Pennsylvania State University, says athletes who continue to train can retain as much as 85% of their gains from using drugs. This isn't based on muscle biopsies or peer-reviewed research, he says, but on 30 years of experience with athletes. He says he has talked privately with hundreds of dopers, some of them champions, and has seen the permanent benefits of performance-enhancing drugs. "These things are like rocket fuel," he says.
Great Information. This supports my belief that AS and PED's change a person giving them athletic potential beyond what they would have had without this use. In my opinion, this erodes the human side of sports participation making it less about what you have inside (heart, commitment, discipline, talent, work ethic, etc.) and more about extrinsic short-term gratification through attitudes that center on "winning at all costs." Money and fame are the big driving forces behind this issue tearing a gapping whole in the concept of character and integrity. The ethical and moral implications are obvious.
Kirk Mango
Author: Becoming a True Champion
Blog: The Athletes Sports Experience
Posted by: Kirk Mango | 04/06/2008 at 15:38
This would be a potent scientific argument in favor of lifetime bans for first offenses.
Posted by: Softie | 04/07/2008 at 15:50
very high tech info and very, and for me dispels what iv always known to be a myth that you lose all of you gains.
Posted by: gear199.com | 07/31/2008 at 11:06
Kirk Mango is a moron; just because you take steroids doesn't mean you stop working hard. You're clearly a couch potato who has no idea what athletes do to gain an edge. The lifetime ban people are a bunch of fascists.
Posted by: Archie | 05/08/2009 at 04:14
Steroids would appear to be useful if run for a short time in life.
Posted by: anabolonline.com | 11/11/2009 at 05:58
I bought this the Dr Max Powers Anabolic Stack and I am a lot more muscular then I was a year ago, when he first started using
I have tried several testosterone products out there and have found the Dr Max Powers Test Boost to be the best. It is more than twice as potent as the top brand that I could find and has given me more strengh. I have recovered quicker after work outs and have been able to increase my work out times. It has definitely helped with the ladies too. I have been bulking up pretty well since I have been taking it regularly, and lifting weights.
Posted by: Mike Walker | 12/06/2009 at 20:32
Very useful imformation, i will definetly be doing more reading from this site.
Posted by: JuiceOffer | 01/13/2010 at 09:29
Great news for both current and users who plan to quit, seems lasting muscle gains are a reality afterall.
btw watch out readers many of the sites mentioned in the comments are well known scammers.
Posted by: Steroids Blog | 02/03/2010 at 04:12
If this study is correct then why do soo many guys shrink when they stop using.
Posted by: Steroids UK | 02/22/2010 at 00:13
It's great to hear from you and see what you've been up to. In your blog I feel your enthusiasm for life. thank you.
Posted by: suprayouth | 09/29/2011 at 10:40
What´s written is true, I feel it also on myself, but I do not mind for now :D
Posted by: james | 06/08/2012 at 17:06