John Seraceno of USA Today recommends as a deterrent to steroid-cheating among professional athletes, the professional leagues start naming names -- of player caught in the steroid sweeps.
The government released a flock of big,
headline-grabbing numbers when it revealed the results, thus far, of
its worldwide probe of illegal steroids and human growth hormone that
focused on China as a major supply source: 124 arrests, the seizure of
$6.5 million, along with 71 weapons, 27 pill presses, 25 vehicles and
more than 11 million doses of steroids.
But it is what the Drug Enforcement
Administration did not disclose — names of users — that might limit the
chance for effective drug curbs in sports. DEA officials said the
nature of the ongoing inquiry prevented the release of such specifics.
When it comes to elite junkies … er, athletes, I seriously doubt many,
if any, names would pop up. They often get their stuff from legitimate
sources (yes, dirty doctors).
Several issues emerge here.
- What is the purpose of the DEA and of federal policy?
- What are the 'rights' of the users who buy illegal drugs?
- How effective would naming names be in drug deterrence?
- Has the federal approach won the 'war on drugs'
The federal government says there is concern about the public health, and the integrity of sports. Fair enough. Another 'war on drugs' -- a war on drug users -- who perform in public facilities to capitalize on their athletic skills.
We have a global scourge. This is not a sports
cause — it is a public health issue. The feds realize they can't
eliminate this stuff on the black market. But they can, as one DEA
spokesman suggested this week, try to cut off the head of the dragon —
raw-material manufacturers and suppliers.
Those trafficking steroids should have smelled a
laboratory rat nearly four years ago when President Bush warned us. He
called upon team owners, union reps, coaches and players to "take the
lead, to send the right signal, to get tough, and to get rid of
steroids now."
It sounded like a populist platitude, to be
sure, but to raise the issue during his State of the Union address
turned out to be a harbinger of the government's new, aggressive
attitude in this arena. Unfortunately, the president's
get-rid-of-steroids-now proclamation was remarkably naive. Rid sports
of steroids?
How effective has the government's strategy -- knock out the distributor --been on the ubiquitous use of drugs. Did I just answer that question?
On the other hand, how effective has the professional sports drug testing program been in eliminating steroids and PEDs in pro leagues? Again, not very.
We have a better chance of eliminating the ubiquitous bag of popcorn sold at concession stands.
"Drug-testing, from a historical perspective, is
a colossal flop," said Chuck Yesalis, the retired Penn State professor,
an expert on such matters. "One might argue that its done more damage
than good because it has kept a façade — 'So-and-so must be clean
because he never flunked a drug test.' "
Clearly, the feds are serious — for now, anyway. But what about professional and amateur sports leagues?
The elimination of PEDs from the pro leagues would appear to be an admirable cause. PEDs clearly unbalance sport, where integrity and combating cheating must reign supreme. No one wants a cheating ump or a cheating ref. No one should want a cheating player. Perhaps that is why Bonds is routinely booed in visiting parks.
The use of anabolic drug presents a real public health issue. The costs will be seen down the road in heart, liver, ligament, and other organ damage seen with chronic use of the drugs.
The last reason is more abstract: the influence athletes hold over youth, and society in general. Realistically a very small percentage of kids will use steroids because a big time jock uses. The unsavory influence on a cheating culture is more pervasive in our view, however that is a very sticky wicket to sell.
The idea that athletes use needles to gain a
competitive advantage is more than a half-century old. What is
particularly worrisome is that young adults love to imitate, and now
the illicit use of performance-enhancing substances has spread into our
schools and neighborhoods. Young folks don't have to worry about
lurking in some back alley to buy from some pusher. They need only sit
down at their PC — and they are.
What can the pro leagues do? Institute the drug testing policy, which is difficult given the adversarial role the player's unions hold in the scheme of things.
Leagues and organizations could make it a lot
tougher on athletes, if they desired. Those entities are awash in
millions of dollars, but they don't pool resources effectively to come
up with a viable solution; instead, they make it look good for public
consumption.
Would naming names reduce PED use? Everyone 'knows' Barry Bonds used (?uses) steroids and PEDs. There continue to be defenders of the gargantuan one who believe steroids don't matter in sports, or that a player is 'innocent until proven guilty'. Naming names might deter a couple players. However consider Gary Matthews; naming Matthews hasn't seemed to hurt either the player or his team this year.
Furthermore, it is a legitimate issue about the player's rights when he is under suspicion in these legal cases. Is it fair for the Gov't to name a player? The Gov't has a different mission that journalists who can question a player's behavior; the Gov't is held to a higher standard because action could contaminate an on-going criminal case.
What would deter athletes form using PEDs?
Sports fraud laws would deter some -- not all -- pro players from using PEDs. It is as much fraud for a player to violate the regulations against PED use as a drug company fudging data on medicines, or a vacuum cleaner company not providing a working product.
Allow DAs and federal attorneys to prosecute millionaire drug cheats as parties to sports fraud. Sports fraud is exactly what the drug cheats do: they defraud fans, other players, and league competition. The names come out and the facts are discussed.
Wait, you say, didn't the BALCO case produce
arrests, convictions and the leaking of a superstar? What about that
New York Mets batboy who admitted to distributing drugs to dozens of
major leaguers? What about the Carolina Panthers team doctor who served
time for distribution? What about the guilty like Rodney Harrison and
Wade Wilson? What about the implicated, like Rick Ankiel, Jay Gibbons
and Troy Glaus?
So-called "wellness" clinics have been busted
from Florida to New York, physicians have been stripped of their
licenses — there is even further welcomed scrutiny in those twin
cesspools of suspected illegal drug use: professional wrestling and
cycling.
You want an effective deterrent? Go to the end user. Go get yourself some high-profile athletes.
The best way to scare the end-user here is to allow the Feds to prosecute under fraud laws. Local authorities might be intimidated by the star power, or simply want to win (hear that Tony LaRussa?). Not a perfect solution -- the perfect solution would be a society that abhors cheating -- but a step in the right direction.
Recent Comments