SignOnSanDiego.com (The San Diego Union-Tribune) and Mark Zeigler report that MLB players may be speeding ahead with 'stimulant' (really amphetamine) use. Way ahead.
It is a single number buried in a 14-page report from the World Anti-Doping Agency, but it is another strong indication that major league baseball players are continuing to pop amphetamines and other banned stimulants despite the introduction of testing last year.
MLB sends urine samples to a Montreal lab, which is WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) certified. Test data is released to WADA, and WADA boss Dick Pound. WADA reported the increased amphetamine positive test results in the annual report. The numbers are startling:
In years past, the Montreal lab reported about 20 annual positives for banned stimulants.
In 2006, the first year MLB began stimulant testing there, the number jumped significantly.
To 104.
The data get complicated because it appears that the positive amphetamine tests are not broken out into sport specific data. However, the jump in positive tests for amphetamine occurred when the MLB tests were added to the Montreal lab's work load (more detail about this after the jump). This suggests, but does not verify that the five-fold increase in amphetamine positives occurred because of the addition of the MLB samples.
Experts and players long identified amphetamine use as problematic in MLB clubhouses as well reported by Zeigler and the San Diego Union-Tribune in April. That piece details greenie use by Pete Rose, among others.
Barry Bonds, by report, gave a positive urine for amphetamine; this was never confirmed by MLB. MLB policy on amphetamine use differs from the policy on steroid use. A player testing positive for amphetamine use goes into counseling for the first positive test and is suspended 25 games for a second. As seen this week, in the MLB a positive test for steroids results in a 50 game suspension, first time.
Sounds like WADA and MLB might have some explaining to do. Perhaps someone can 'leak' this...
(From the Union-Tribune)
“We had a lot of stimulants in 2006, yes, that I can confirm,” said Christiane Ayotte, the director of the Montreal lab. “But that's as far as I can go. I cannot confirm what sport they were in. I won't do that.”
A spokesman for MLB said it was aware the Montreal lab would include its testing results for WADA's 2006 report, which was obtained by the Union-Tribune. But he declined comment on what those numbers might mean about the effectiveness of baseball's testing program or the state of energy-boosting stimulants in the game.
In the absence of a fully transparent testing program by baseball, the WADA report may be the closest thing to real numbers of positive tests.
“It's crying out for an explanation for variants from the preceding three years,” said Dr. Gary Wadler, who serves on WADA committees and has been a vocal critic of baseball's anti-doping policies. “You go from an average of about 20 per year to over 100? What's the explanation?”
The only one of WADA's 33 accredited labs with more stimulant positives in 2006 was UCLA, with 134. But UCLA, which conducts baseball's minor league testing among numerous other sports, handled more than twice as many urine samples last year as Montreal.
From 2003-2005, 10 percent of positive tests from the Montreal lab were for amphetamines or other banned stimulants. In 2006, 34 percent were.
Or put another way: Using the Montreal lab's prior numbers as a guide, MLB could account for as many as 80 or 90 positive tests for stimulants in 2006 – or potentially one in every 10 players.
The release of the WADA report comes as former Sen. George Mitchell is in the “final phases” of his inquiry into the prevalence of banned performance-enhancing substances in baseball. There also was the news last month that Kirk Radomski, a former New York Mets batboy said to be a steroid dealer to dozens of baseball players, is cooperating with federal authorities. And before the season, a Florida pharmacy was raided that allegedly sold banned human growth hormone to Los Angeles Angels outfielder Gary Matthews Jr.
All the while, Barry Bonds – linked to both steroid and amphetamine use – is closing in on the game's most hallowed record, Hank Aaron's 755 career home runs. Bonds hit No. 745 on Tuesday.
Baseball's players union agreed to steroid testing in the early 2000s but resisted including stimulants – or greenies, as players refer to them – until last year.
Players are tested at least twice a year. A first positive test triggers six additional random tests over the next 12 months but no public admonition. A second positive fetches a 25-game suspension.
To date, no baseball player has been suspended for stimulants.
So how to explain the five-fold increase in positives at the Montreal lab last year, particularly when stimulant positives dropped by nearly 25 percent in 2006 at the rest of WADA's testing facilities?
One explanation is that the statistics include all positive findings, whether or not they resulted in sanctioning by a sport's governing body. Baseball players may have unabashedly used amphetamines hoping they wouldn't get caught and knowing even if they did, they'd get a free pass for the first positive test.
Another variable is TUEs, or therapeutic use exemptions. The most common treatment for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is amphetamines, and several sources have told the Union-Tribune that numerous baseball players had obtained such medical waivers allowing them to use amphetamines.
ahhh the medical waiver free pass, ala david segui need for HGH......there is no shame
Posted by: fredbeene | 05/11/2007 at 10:13
Your article is very appealing to me.
Posted by: jeremy scott | 03/24/2011 at 02:27
Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts.Any way Ill be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon
Posted by: Asics Mexico 66 | 03/24/2011 at 02:37
I know that's incredible taking different stimulants while we playing or doing physical activities, but little by little you are gonna feel bad because you don't have the same performance.m10m
Posted by: cialis online | 04/15/2011 at 14:44
I see parallels between Landis and Canseco and Armstrong & Palmero.
Posted by: Christian Louboutin Outlet | 05/13/2011 at 21:33
china electronics wholesale from
http://www.buybuyseller.com
Posted by: 朋 陈 | 06/23/2011 at 20:43
wedding dresses from
http://www.dresspromgirl.com/
Posted by: 朋 陈 | 06/23/2011 at 20:44
naruto cosplay form
http://www.webcosplaycostumes.com/naruto-cosplay-c-84.html
Posted by: 朋 陈 | 06/23/2011 at 20:44
Good job for me to write here,This is really my very first time here , great looking blog.i will read more.
Posted by: christian louboutin outlet | 05/10/2012 at 12:54