Female bodybuilder Julie Coram taking horse steroid

Big Brown nothing, his Winstrol appears minor next to some of this stuff.  The Winnipeg Sun reports Canadian bodybuilder Julie Coram juiced up on veterinarian anabolic steroid boldenone -- Equipoise.  She also tested positive for oxandrolone, or Anavar.

Winnipeg fitness champion Julie Coram (recent photo on left; comare with old photo below) tested positive for high levels of three anabolic steroids, including a derivative of one used to treat injured horses, according to the circuit who tested her.

Bodybuilders use the boldenone derivative, known as 6B-hydroxyboldenone, to add strength and size but it is harmful to humans, said Mike Clement, in charge of anti-doping for FAME World Tour, which promotes itself as a natural fitness circuit and its sanctioning body, the World Natural Sports Organization.

  "You're taking your life in your hands by taking this stuff," Clement said.

The only legal way to obtain the steroid in Canada is through a veterinarian but it can be acquired illegally, Clement said.

Coram also tested positive for oxandrolone and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), he said.

This is going to hurt her career, unless the Preakness is up next on the agenda (low blow, we know). 

Coram provided a urine sample after she won the female muscle model category at the Ainsley McSorley FAME Model Search Championships in Winnipeg on May 24.

A week later, before the drug test results were known, she was named 2008 Miss Fitness Manitoba at the Manitoba Body Building Association's (MABBA) provincial championships.

Coram is banned from FAME World Tour events and was stripped of her FAME pro card and title.

Now will come the usual excuses or questions about the testing procedures:

Coram claims the process wasn't done properly or according to Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport standards, Heffner said.

She did not return a telephone message seeking comment.

FAME producer and WNSO co-president Jeffrey Kippel said the test was done properly and the sample was not tampered with.

"On one hand, it's too bad that she entered our competition and went through this. On the other hand, we're glad that we've caught this and exposed it because maybe it's something that is going to help her and other people," Kippel said.

He said FAME judges flagged Coram for a drug test when they saw her on stage and were told her body size had increased substantially over a short period.

FAME doesn't test all winners.

Kippel said positive tests are rare in the sport.

"When something like this happens, it kind of puts the other competitors into question in the public eye," Kippel said. "For someone to cheat their way through, it's not fair."

Comments

[Brian]

I wouldn't complain if she left some oats in my sack.

[todd]

Cheaters never win !!!!
Glad she got caught

hey Brian she'd leave more than oats in your sack she would nayh and turn around kick you in the sack with her hind legs and gallop away

[todd]

Cheaters never win !!!!
Glad she got caught

hey Brian she'd leave more than oats in your sack she would nayh and turn around kick you in the sack with her hind legs and gallop away

[sal m]

she should get her money back...it didn't do too much for her physique but it did give her a horse face...i guess it doesn't take too much to win one of these contests nowadays.

[Cassey]

Horse face is right.
What's fit about that?
She might have placed well in the mens catagory

C

[TB]

... I am shocked at this site completely. I have seen her compete.. and in person, this girl is amazing. She has some amazing photos, she is outgoing and a extremely positive asset to society.

I also am training for Figure competitions and ANYONE who thinks it doesn't take much to win.. is jut plainly ignorant.

Also.. who says this is even the truth ?? WOW.. we do live in a guilty before trial society!!

[TB]

I Agree!!

I know of the guy that runs this Fame event and he has almost gone under a few times now. He needs all the publicity that he can get. I have talked to some of the people involved (more then I can say for that Sun reporter) and there are a lot of unanswered questions that I think well get answered in the next little while. So I would be careful on passing judgement just yet. You may have to get your hoofs out of your mouth before this is done. And as far as how she looks. I have seen her to and if you said no to that one then I guess your still a virgin because she in all women trust me.

[gene x hwang]

Actually I think she's a figure competitor not a bodybuilder but that's more semantics with regards to the subject of this article...

[sal m]

the dead giveaway should have been that part of the first prize purse was a sugar cube, salt lick and a bag of oats....if they had a big wreath of flowers to place around her head it would be perfect.

[salt-ee]

to those who defend her actions is purely a joke.
Anyone who has seen her at the gym in the city ove the lat 5 months saw her explode in growth.
The tests were done accurately.
You really think FAME would open themselves up to a slander lawsuit?
The Winipeg Sun , Global news, etc?
give your head a shake!!!
These are facts. She's a cheater! done
why she entered a natural competition is that her ego is absolutely insane. She is a media whore and she is now getting more attention than she ever could imagine!
You got your 15min of fame. Now go trot off into the sun set!!

Actually, to those who pass judgement without knowing her is a joke. Whether she took the drugs or not, it doesn't change the fact that she is an amazing, caring person with a huge heart.

[Tom]

Yes you are right Steroids does enlarge the heart too and does put you at a greater risk for heart attacks and strokes.

Okay, let's say the test was all bogus, which I doubt, but for the sake of argument, let's say it is. If horsey has nothing to hide, the first thing she should have done was volunteer to take another test. The fact that she hasn't defended herself one bit speaks volumes.

She is so self-absorbed it isn't even funny, and I am speaking from experience as I have known her for over 10 years.

[Tom]

now now she did respond
when asked to comment she said
"nyaaaaggghhhh ahahahaha....pfffrrrttt...ppppffrrrrtt"

[Steroid Nation]

As authors of the site, we do feel empathy for competitors. It appears figure competition is so far askew that an athlete almost needs to juice to compete. It's the prisoner's dilemma.

What to do? Should any competitor be allowed to juice in any way possible? Get ready for some body bags (not just due to anabolic steroids, but due to a combination of things).

Or should competitors be allowed to use certain PEDs with a doctor's monitoring? If that happened the competitors would not have to use Vet prep Equipose.

Or should all PEDs be banned with heavy drug testing?

[fit204]

the amount of lean muscle mass that she gained in a year IS questionable, that is why she was flagged... judges were informed of this and it was prevalent at the competition when compared next to the other competitors who had more of a natural look. the wnso is NOT a joke, these tests are sent off to a lab and there is no one "tampering" with these tests....they have legal standards to follow also.
the fact is this was a urine sample.......did she find a horse to piss in the cup? no of course not. I find it also questionable for someone who had TWO stress fractures in both ankles to be able to still train, practice a routine, walk in stilettos and do cardio without being in such pain that even walking would be difficult. would these steroids have helped her be able to push through all this? maybe.

upon entering the competition ALL athletes are all made well aware of the consequences of using steroids and entering a wnso sanctioned event, and that the wnso has the right to ask for a urine sample and they can go under a lie detector at any time, even out of competition. they are also made aware and sign away on documents that the wnso CAN take legal action for "tricking" the organization and cheating their way through.
she may be a nice girl, but WHY did she have to compete in a natural organization? she didn't want the results to be made public, but the wnso has published every competitor who has tested positive on their website before her... she is not being "singled" out.

from the website

A. Physique Screening:

Athletes will be screened by the Physique Screening Panel the day prior to the contest at the Athlete Registration Meeting or during the first round of competition on show day. All athletes sign a waiver prior to competing and agree to be questioned and evaluated by the Physique Screening Panel. Should the panel determine the athlete does not fit the natural look (and would then not place well in a natural show) and/or has reason to conclude the athlete is displaying results from banned substance usage, this could result in immediate disqualification. *** Scroll down for specific details

B.Urine Testing:

Urine samples may be asked of several athletes over the competition weekend, right from the moment of registration. Additionally, anyone deemed ‘suspicious’ to any of the judges will be asked to provide an immediate urine sample in order to be eligible to continue to compete that day. Overall champions, random athletes and winners may also be flagged for urine sampling following or during the event. Once the event is finished, all samples will be sent to the lab at which time either random or deliberately selected samples will be tested for banned substances.

C.Legal Document:

All athletes must sign their name to the Doping Control Waiver (see below) outlining that they follow the natural requirements of the WNSO. Legal action can be taken against anyone caught as having tried to ‘trick’ the system and cheat their fellow athletes.

D.Out-of-Competition Drug Testing Policy.

All competitive athletes may be subject to random urine testing at any time before or after a competition. Upon selection, either a WNSO representative will meet you or you will be given 24 hours to report to your local lab. WNSO Is serious about its 'Natural Physique' policy and is doing its best to weed out those who are attempting to cheat the system and their fellow athletes.

BANNED SUBSTANCES:

Anything that is not sold over the counter is considered a banned substance. These include stimulants, narcotics, prescription diuretics, beta blockers, anabolic agents or androgens (includes anabolic steroids, testosterone, growth hormone or any of their preparations or derivatives), peptide and glycoprotein hormones and analogues, and any related substances.

Substances Often Questioned

* Ephedrine – As ephedrine is commercially available in some over-the-counter medications, an athlete may use it providing urine tests do not show that it was “abused” or used outside the guidelines.

* Herbal Diuretics – These are allowed.

* Recreational Drugs – We do not test for these with the exception of cocaine and its preparations and derivatives

* Prohormone Products – Although prohormone products may be available commercially, their use may be detected in urinalysis screenings and result in a positive test. Prohormone products should be avoided.

* Prescription Medications – These are often required and may pose some concerns with the drug-screening process. An athlete on such medications will be requested to provide at least one of the following: a signed letter from his or her doctor indicating the medical condition and its specific requirement; or the prescription bottle or package of medication bearing the athlete’s name, physicians name, drug name and dosage strength. There should not be an issue if the drug has not visibly “enhanced” the athlete’s physique. In that case the athlete would not be allowed to compete, just like anyone else. If an athlete is uncertain whether a particular product or medication may be a concern, he or she is advised to contact the Head Judge before event registration to determine an appropriate course of action. However, this step DOES NOT mean the athlete is given a pass. The athlete still has to undergo the same drug-testing procedures as all other athletes.

PHYSIQUE SCREENING

The Physique Screening Panel &/or WNSO Judging Panel pays close attention to the criteria stated herein to come to a unanimous conclusion on whether a certain athlete has the maintained the effects of current or past use of banned substances.

The existence of the Panel is in no way a deterrent for exceptional natural athletes but serves as a means of banning athletes who do not possess a “natural” look. Should the Panel not reach a conclusive decision with respect to a particular athlete, the Head Judge reserves the right to ban the athlete from competing or to allow the athlete to compete and have him or her flagged for urinalysis or a lie-detector test.

It is understood that there is no 100% accurate means of detecting banned substances and that the Panel is simply a tool to assist in the detection of athletes who will not fare well in competition because of some or many of the following indications of such substances:

* Abnormal Muscular Development:
A level of muscular development deemed unlikely attainable without the use of banned substances

* Jaundice or Discoloration of Eyes:
Quite often the use or abuse of medications or anabolic agents that cause stress on the liver or kidneys results in discoloration of the white portion of the eye.

* Abdominal Distention:
Abdominal swelling may suggest the presence of androgenic or hormonal medications.

* Acne:
A common side effect of androgen use is acne in specific locations, which can be cystic in nature and is present in both males and females.

* Elongation of Bones:
In some cases the use of hormonal drugs can result in the continued growth of bones. Specific areas of the face and body that may indicate concern are the mandible, or lower jawbone, and the ulna (the inner and longer of the two forearm bones, at the elbow).

* Masculinization of Females:
Androgen use in females is often accompanied by masculinization, signs of which are often evident in the facial region and can also include a deepening of the voice and abnormal muscular development. Facial hair is sometimes evident in females who have used testosterone-related compounds.

* Baldness:
The conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone can cause hair loss that is prevalent among males, and such hair loss is one possible symptom of androgen use.

* Gynecomastia:
The conversion of testosterone to excess estrogen can cause male- breast enlargement, evident by puffiness around the nipple(s). Close attention should be paid to this area in male athletes, as this condition is a common side effect of anabolic steroids.

Please Note:

*** The presence of any of the above indications alone is not necessarily evidence of banned-substance abuse, as many athletes could display symptoms that are attributable to other conditions. The above is simply a guide to use in assessing an athlete’s physique, in its totality, to make a determination on whether the person is “suspect” of having administered banned substances.

*** Any decision made by the Panel or Head Judge to ban an athlete is deemed final, and the issue will not be debated after a decision is reached. Registration fees may be returned to a banned athlete but will not be refunded if the Panel feels the athlete has knowingly or recklessly used banned substances.

DOPING CONTROL:

All athletes must sign the following waiver prior to competing. Anyone who does not sign this form will not be eligible to compete.

I certify that I meet the natural requirements promulgated by the World Natural Sports Organization (WNSO). I have not used any banned or potentially harmful substances to enhance my appearance or performance. I hereby agree to undergo all testing procedures described herein and any other reasonable re-tests to ensure that I meet the WNSO's natural requirements. Testing will encompass steroids, diuretics, beta-blockers, or other athletic enhancing substances. I also understand that High Levels of Andro, although sold over the counter in the US, does mimic "Deca" on a urine test and I am aware that if my urine test comes back positive for "Deca" I will have failed my drug test. I understand that if I refuse any or part of the testing procedures, this will be considered as an automatic failure and I will not be permitted to compete, forfeiting any registration payments I already made.

I understand that I must stand in front of the Physique Screening Panel &/or the WNSO Judges - prior to or during competition- in a posing suit or swimsuit as they will determine whether or not I am permitted to enter in the competition. I further understand that the Physique Screening Assessment may disqualify me, in its absolute unfettered discretion, if they determine that I do not fit the look or profile of a natural athlete. This screening process will take place either prior to the event or at the event, and if the Physique Screening Panel does not allow me to compete based on their assessment, the competition entry fee will be refunded. If this is the case, at no time will WNSO report my name anywhere. However, if the Physique Screening Assessment determines that it is clear that I have knowingly or recklessly used a banned substance, engaged in an improper practice, or have otherwise cheated, no refund will be made and my name can be made public. In any event, if I am disqualified by the Physique Screening Panel I will abide by its decision without incident or further recourse. There is no restitution or compensation to me from WNSO, FAME, any affiliates or from the Physique Screening Panel members other than the possible full refund of the competition entry fees as stated above.
I will undergo the Physique Screening Assessment as well as possible random and selected Urinalysis Testing, and/or a Lie Detector Examination - either during this current event or out-of-competition. I will complete this test(s) without any tampering of the sample and/or information provided. I understand that if I am selected at any time during the year I will report to the WNSO selected testing facility. I also acknowledge that refusal of this test will result in an automatic failure. I further understand that if there are still concerns about meeting the Natural Requirements Mandate, I may be called back to be questioned in private by the panel of judges. I also understand that a failure of any type of test executed by WNSO's Doping Control Unit and/or a refusal to take a test may result in an immediate lifetime disqualification from all WNSO sanctioned events without any financial consideration or reimbursement. I also understand that if I am disqualified my name and/or image and the reason for my suspension may be listed on websites, in newsletters, media releases, television and may be shared with affiliate organizations.
I acknowledge that the failure of any one athlete to abide by WNSO's natural requirements hurts not only the WNSO but all the athletes and spectators competing and attending the WNSO events. I therefore, in consideration of an identical or similar covenant from other competitors, contract with all other competitors at any WNSO sanctioned event in which I might compete (including this one) that I shall be liable in damages as the result of the breach of any of WNSO's requirements relative to natural testing. I irrevocably constitute WNSO as my agent to enter into this mutual covenant with the other competitors at this and any future WNSO event in which I might partake. I acknowledge that, in addition, I shall be liable in damages to WNSO for any such breach of its rules I might commit. I therefore certify that I have not "cheated" in my preparation for this competition and in particular I have not used any banned or illegal performance enhancing substances.
In addition to the drug testing policy, I am also aware of the Competitor Rules and Regulations. In such, I certify that I will not apply tanning creams or oils in any areas other than the designated spots backstage. If I go beyond these spots and get the walls, floor, chairs, mirrors, or cabinets dirty etc. I will be responsible for any and all additional 'clean-up' charges applied to the event. I also realize that backstage is limited to athletes only and if I try to sneak someone in I may be asked to leave with out reimbursement. As well, should I end up NOT competing for any reason, I am aware that my fees will neither be refunded nor transferred.

[TB]

Oh if she was not GREAT at this sport.. no one would care. Well she was a FITNESS competitor.. so not bodybuilding, and not figure.

However, sometimes winner push through alot.. even broken limbs. I have seen other do it in the past.

The truth is yet to come.

Someone who knows Julie for 10 years, and doesn't like her, and doesn't know the true her. Well I must say you must be extremely jealous. Seeing someone at the Gym.. and knowing the person are NOT the same.

I really hope the truth comes out.. what comes around goes around... and it will come back to bite someone.

If you go to a the novice or provincial shows in Winnipeg, Clients that train with Julie's company show very good at the show. That is talent!!!

[CS]

I realize that what she has done, is not correct in the outside world. But I do not believe that she encourages her clients. I think that this should have no bearing with her clientelle because she did this as her own choice. I disagree with the above statement, I am in full understanding that her clientelle know her, and work with her on a close basis and that they will not opt out of business with her just because of her choice. She is a great trainer, and I have reason to believe this may put a damper on this title, but she will go on and be great, and her client base will only expand.

Don't forget that steroids didnt give her the look she has, she also worked her ass off, as much as the other girls. The steroids just set her one tiny bit above everyone at the show, and I believe that she /non ster,/ would have been just as competitive.

[TB]

She is a great Trainer... with a lot of knowledge, skill, and positive reinforcement with her clients.
She did work hard.. and yes all the other girls I am sure did too.

Training, eating right, and competing is all hard work.

No one.. can sit on the couch and at the end of the day look like that!!

[jg]

Seem like this is a hot topic. I would like to hear from the other side also but I am sure that they are waiting because that is what the lawyers are telling them to do. In cases like this it is best to let one side say everything they need to say and usually they say way to much and get themselves in trouble. It seems to me that FAME has fallen right into this trap and they better be 100% sure that what they are saying is correct.

It seems to me that they are posting this all over the media and internet and that could be taken as slander if for some reason things just are not as they seem. I would think that the best position to be in is to work carefully and professionally with this information. The way they are going about this by working hard and putting their name everywhere they possible can tells me that they want to promote themselves as some type of Steroid slaying hero rather then trying to work with all involved to come to resolution.

[Scott Welch]

There are also many dietary supplements that would cause a positive drug test for both Boldenone and Oxandrolone metabolites which is something many competitors don't realize. The FAME "Doping Control" list above warns about "Andro" but should also warn about "precursor supplements". These "precursor supplements" convert into either Oxandronlone or Boldenone once they are processed by your liver and they can be legally sold in America right now. Now I am not saying this is the case with Julie Coran but it's something for competitors to be aware of. We should commend the Fame organization for at least testing some of their athletes which is a step in the right direction for these "natural" physique events.

[Millard Baker]

I'm not a big fan of the FAME doping control protocols. I think the goal of providing "natural" bodybuilding and physique contests is good especially when presented as an alternate to the laissez-faire pharmaceutical field of competitors in "other" organizations.

But the FAME contests (even by their very own rules) are far removed from natural competition (whatever that may be).

First of all, they have a silly rule where they base the "natural" status of the athlete on appearance ("physique screening"). The eyeball approach can be used to determine whether someone looks natural or can be disqualified because they look like they are on steroids, etc.

Secondly, natural status is based upon legal status. This is ridiculous. "Anything that is not sold over the counter is considered a banned substance."

So, any sports nutrition supplement sold over the counter is permitted, right? Well, technically yes since they are not banned.

But as Scott Welch points out, you can be disqualified if any substance (banned or not banned) converts to urinary metabolites that indicate a positive doping result.

This means that if the athlete used a banned substance, it is a true positive.

If they did NOT use a banned substance, then it is a FALSE POSITIVE.

Because of the internal contradiction of their own rules, I seriously doubt that such a test result would stand up in a court of law.

In the absence of a rule or regulation explicitly banning specific OTC supplements, I don't think the following disclaimer from FAME has any legal relevance:

Although prohormone products may be available commercially, their use may be detected in urinalysis screenings and result in a positive test. Prohormone products should be avoided.

[...]

I also understand that High Levels of Andro, although sold over the counter in the US, does mimic "Deca" on a urine test and I am aware that if my urine test comes back positive for "Deca" I will have failed my drug test.",

[jg]

Thank Scott for the info. I agree that there should be a screening process for events but there could be any number of reasons that this test came up positive and that in the end we have to recognize that in this sport to achieve great winning results it takes a lot of hard work. There are many competitors that may not know some of the information that you have given and thus does not make them cheaters nor should they be labeled as such.

[Manitoba]

I would like to say that Julie deserves to be made a fool of. For those of you who are her clients and train with her, you dont really know her. I was next to Julie at the Fame show where A TON of her clients competed and overheard Julie say "what is this a fat show?" Julie believes she is better then everyone and does nothing unless it gets her ahead. I have seen her walk all over many friends. Most of Julie and Craigs clients at contest prep are young girls who think she is so amazing. If my trainer competed against me and was caught doing steroids in the same show and class I did, I would have a hard time defending her. Julie loves attention and the spot light and that is what she got. Its too bad that she is a role model to some of these young girls. I am sure when they get older and wiser they will stop defending her. If she wasnt gulity, then why is she calling everyone u and appologizing? Why not take another urine test? If that was me and I was innocent, I would have been at the Winnipeg Sun the next morning at any cost, ready to take a test. Julie wasnt!

I am not sure if any of her clients that competed in Fame are posting here. Also I don't know who Julie has called and who she has not called. I also don't know if she has been retested. I can't say she has or had NOT done anything. I do know she is a good person. Everyone is still Judge and Jury.. when this situation is not complete. I am sure Julie in due time will release a statement.

How does so many people know what is going on with Julie right now? Manitoba did she call you? and she tell you her every move? Get Real. NO ONE needs to be "made a fool of".

Why would someone go to the WPG SUN with Urine?